On February 28th, Asian Week
apologized for publishing Kenneth Eng’s column “Why I Hate Blacks,” and announced that Eng would no longer write for them. Editor Ted Fang apologized in a March 1st press conference, and on March 2nd held a community forum about race relations. But Fang has yet to explain how the column was ever published, or why they did not take action earlier when Eng wrote similar columns for the newspaper. When first confronted about the column, Editor-in-Chief Samson Wong replied that they publish diverse opinions in the Asian-American community – even its “disturbing warts.”
While Asian Week
now says that its editorial process is “under review,” how did they even hire someone like Eng in the first place? As the editors of SFist have proven
, an online search of Kenneth Eng provides plenty of evidence that he is at worst a racist – or at best extremely angry and unstable. In an age of Google searches, the editors of Asian Week
had simply no excuse to not know whom they were dealing with. Eng was a symptom of a larger problem, and more questions need to be answered before the paper regains its reputation in the community.
I have read in the past few days more of Eng’s writings than anyone should, and the only conclusion I can come up with is that he is a vicious racist. On his personal blog, Eng wrote in January 2007 that religious people “tend to be incredibly stupid or poor,” and are “usually black/hispanic immigrants who do not have the brains or the balls to understand science and thus resort to reading retarded stories about saviors and saints.”
In August 2004, Eng recounted in an online webzine his experiences at NYU where he encountered “anti-Asian discrimination,” and was ostracized for his provocative views. But he never elaborates in the piece what his actual opinions were, besides “Hitler was not a coward” and that African-Americans receive “unfair assistance.” While opposing affirmative action is not necessarily racist, anyone who reads the article
can tell that Eng has a serious chip on his shoulder, and that his rhetoric could easily descend into hate speech.
But the most disturbing part of Eng’s writings is a website that he created called “Yellow Skull” – where he urges Asian-Americans to unite against blacks and whites, and to “finally make those big-eyed fuckers suffer.” He calls both white and black people “the enemy,” glorifies Asians who have killed whites in self-defense, and says that white people “deserve” to be decapitated. I don’t recommend viewing the site.
Besides his racist views, Eng has problems with telling the truth – not a hallmark of responsible journalism. He repeatedly calls himself the “youngest published science fiction novelist in America,” although it’s factually incorrect and the book that he wrote was self-published. And like Peter Ragone
, Eng got busted in November 2005 for posting comments on a website about science fiction novels – where he gave rave reviews about his own book by using a fake name.
I don’t know what Asian Week
knew about Eng before they hired him – Samson Wong never called me back although I called and e-mailed him with questions. But assuming they were merely negligent for not doing a Google search, their behavior became reckless when Eng started writing for the paper. In the past several months, Eng wrote two columns, “Why I Hate Asians” and “Proof that Whites Inherently Hate Us,” that contained enough rhetoric to put any responsible editor on notice.
In “Proof that Whites Inherently Hates Us” (published in Asian Week
on November 24, 2006), Eng argued that convicted murderer Chai Vang
“righteously killed six white people” and compared him favorably to Rosa Parks. “Animals, through evolution,” he said, “are intrinsically developed to detest organisms that are different.” Therefore, he argued, “it should be no surprise that whites have evolved to hate Asians.”
allows readers in its online version to post comments about articles on a moderated response board, but that “comments using inappropriate language will not be posted.” When readers posted critical comments about his November 24th column, Eng replied on the message board in part by referring to black people as “darkies.” If a racial slur is not “inappropriate language,” what is?
was right to fire Eng and issue a formal apology, but they can’t just treat the problem as solved. “It was not just a lapse of judgment -- but a lack of judgment,” said Vincent Pan of Chinese for Affirmative Action. “They need editors who understand the added level of responsibility that comes with running an ethnic publication. How can they claim to have roots in civil rights if they had such a fundamental lack of judgment of what impact the piece would have?”
To deal with the problem, Asian Week
announced that they are “reviewing the editorial process” -- but did not elaborate on what exactly that would entail. “I don’t know how long it takes to review a process that only has two editors,” said Pan. “Everyone wants to welcome Asian Week
back to the world of responsible journalism, but it has to be clear about what changes will be made.”
Keith Kamisugi of the Equal Justice Society attended the March 2nd forum, where various members of the media met to discuss the implications of Eng’s column. Ted Fang was present, but Samson Wong was not. “It’s a success anytime people of color come together to discuss race relations between our communities,” said Kamisugi. “But the forum was supposed to focus on journalistic responsibility following Asian Week
’s printing of Eng’s hate speech. That wasn’t accomplished.”
According to Kamisugi, some panelists at the forum even implied that to call for further redress from Asian Week
was like beating a dead horse. But it’s not enough just to say you’re sorry and to get rid of a racist columnist. Asian Week
had plenty of opportunities to realize that Kenneth Eng had no business at their newspaper – or any publication for that matter – and the fact that they let the problem fester needs to be examined.
For starters, Asian Week
needs to be upfront about who was responsible for approving Eng’s column. There’s a critical difference between exposing the community’s “disturbing warts,” and giving a mouthpiece to racist bigots. Asian Week
must explain the details of their editorial process, and what specific changes are going to be made.
“It sets a dangerous precedent,” said Pan, “that if you publish hate speech, only he or she who writes it will be held accountable.”
Send feedback to firstname.lastname@example.org